False
Pop-Up Warning Messages:
Dont be fooled by these messages
OK. You know your computer, and everyone is concerned with
safety. You are browsing the Internet and suddenly you get a
message that your system was detected to be infected with
some malady. Do you wish to clean it? Of course you would,
if the problem was real. The issue is that there are many
pop-up messages that warn your machine is infected and offer
the promise of remediation when these false warnings are
actually a way for your system to become infected.
Users Being Duped
It
is really a simple process. A pop-up window says you are
infected and offers you the chance to have your machine
protected. Anyone who ever had an infection or knew someone
who did and lost data from their computer would of course
want to preserve their machine. That is what these malicious
pop-ups want you to think. A recent study from the North
Carolina State University Psychology Department determined
that you simply cant count on most users to do the right
thing when theyre faced with fake pop-up warning windows.
The research proved what many in IT departments nationwide
would have said if asked the question.
About The Study
The
study looked at whether visual design cues, i.e. the entire
box being an active click and not just the OK button,
differences in the window for the pop-up, etc. in a
malicious warning message would give it away as a phony. The
study determined that most users can't detect the cues. When
presented with a fake message that their system was
compromised with infection of some kind the participants in
the study were fooled by phony system error messages 63
percent of the time. That means that they chose the OK
button in the message box, rather than closing it or
minimizing it, according to the study. Only 27 percent of
the participants closed out the warning box.
What was the difference?
The
study used four types of pop-ups; a real Windows XP pop-up
and the three fake ones. While they all looked much the
same, there were differences. The error text in all four
messages were the same; The instruction at 0x77f41d24
referenced memory at 0x595c2a4c. The memory could not be
read. Click OK to terminate program. There were
differences though, even if they were subtle. The first
false warning message had a visible minimize button and
changed the cursor to a hand icon when the mouse hovered
over it. This would not happen with a normal error message.
The second warning had the same features, plus a flashing
background from black to white. The third false message
displayed a minimize button, the Internet browser status
bar, and changed the cursor to a hand icon when hovering
over the OK button.
What were the parameters?
According to the study published by the North Carolina State
University Psychology Department, over 40 undergraduates
participated in the study. They were using Windows XP
Service Pack 2, a MySQL database which was used to collect
participant responses, and a specially designed Internet
browser simulator. The participants were not told the actual
purpose of the study, but were told to rate 20
health-related Websites for clutter and readability on the
page via an online rating scale. During their evaluation of
those sites, the subjects were presented with the four types
of error messages. When the study was completed, the
researchers conducted a post-study survey of the
participants. They found that even though most of those who
participated were aware of the existence of fake pop-up
warning windows, they were still duped. About 12 percent of
participants said they clicked on the OK button in the
pop-up because the text told them to do so, and 23 percent
say
they
always click on OK whenever they receive an error message
and over 40 percent of participants said they clicked OK
because they wanted to get rid of the box Getting hit with
multiple warnings didnt do much to improve their ability to
distinguish the bad warning messages from the real ones,
with the majority of participants fell for the false error
messages over and over and over!
Is This Done in the Wild?
Yes, it is. Have you ever gotten a pop-up that says your
system has a virus or other Malware and click here to clean
it? If you have and your company does not have a
device
in place like a WebGate from Mi5, then you have been the
subject of a false report. These reports often use the same
techniques as the old social engineering attempts to
penetrate your system. These pop-ups make you think they are
doing you a favor. An example is Vista Antivirus 2008, also
known as Vista Antivirus 2008. Vista Antivirus XP 2008 and
Vitae Antivirus 2008 are clones of Windows Antivirus 2008
which is a rogue anti-spyware program. This family of
products is usually installed by a Trojan infection which
may slip into your system through a security hole. Once
installed, the program begins displaying pop-ups and alert
messages of imaginary infections or threats to get you to
purchase the full program.
What can be done?
Read and pay attention. If you are in the IT department,
pass along the differences between real and fake messages to
your company. There are a lot of malicious programmers out
there who would like nothing better than to add your
machine(s) to the pool of those infected with their errant
code. Watch for information about this and other topics here
and on security web sites. If you have questions or comments
about this article or if there is anything new on the
subject, contact me. I would be happy to respond!
All product names / logos,
company names / logos are copyrights of their respective
holders. John Boline is an MCSE, CNE, USE and a member of
the Network Professional Association. The content herein is
often based on late-breaking events. Much of the material is
based on information from sources that are believed to be
reliable. Hagerman & Company, Inc. disclaims all warranties
as to the ultimate accuracy or completeness of the
information. Hagerman & Company, Inc. and its employees
shall have no liability for errors, omissions or
inadequacies in the information contained within this
article or for any interpretations thereof. The
recommendations, positions and best practice policies
outlined herein represent Hagerman & Company, Inc. initial
analysis and therefore are subject to change as further
information which may have bearing on these positions is
made available. The reader assumes sole responsibility for
the selection of these materials to achieve its intended
results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change
without notice. Hagerman & Company, Inc. assumes no
obligation to update the forward-looking statements made in
this newsletter to reflect any change in circumstances,
after the date of publication. Entire contents 2008
Hagerman & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction
of this publication in any form without prior written
permission is forbidden
top