|
|
|
|
|
Technology
Bulletin |
 |
64-Bit PC’s Take
Off:
Have the
applications caught up after two years?
In 2006, I wrote an article for this
technical perspective that talked about 64-bit PC’s.
(http://newsletters.hagerman.com/newsletters/ebul40-WP.htm). In it I discussed the advent of the 64-bit architecture
along with a history of the PC processor. Time passed. In
2007 I revisited the topic talking about operating systems
and applications that run in Native 64-bit mode. (http://newsletters.hagerman.com/newsletters/ebul56-WP.htm) Here we are in 2008 and the subject has come up again.
People who are looking at new computer purchases want to get
the biggest, fastest machine they can afford, and that is
not a bad thing. That means looking at a dual or quad core
machine with Windows XP Professional 64 (people are still
saying NO to Vista, and with good reason). But then they
look for applications. That is the rub. Over two years since
the proliferation of 64-bit technologies, applications still
lag. Let me share with you what I have found.
Application Development
For many years now, leading applications have been developed
for PC’s on the 32-bit platform. It was really simple
economics. The platform was widespread, it was mature and it
simply had the biggest audience. Applications that first ran
on the 64-bit architecture were ‘ported’. They ran in a
special memory space called ‘compatibility mode’. What this
meant was that some programs would ‘run’, but they were not
taking advantage of the pluses that 64-bit hardware and
operating systems brought to the table.
Has the 64-bit Future Arrived?
True 64-bit computing has been around for over 16 years now.
People who have been referred to as UNIX snobs (their term,
not mine) have been using 64-bit RISC-based processors to
run high end and mission critical servers. Big name
companies had their RISC-based processor systems such as Sun
Microsystems Inc.'s SPARC, IBM's Power and Hewlett-Packard
Co.'s PA-RISC. Still, professionals in 3D design, animation,
and engineering… even hard core gamers constantly demand
more memory and the high-performance graphics that are
enabled by 64-bit addressability. Intel and AMD have risen
to the challenge and have provided the 64-bit processors for
the future. But just as adoption of Windows Vista has been
slow, so has the adoption of 64-bit technology. First it was
the hardware costs. When the prices started to drop, there
were no applications
Problems
While hardware is relatively easy to get and at prices that
are always dropping, the application still fail to be there
as are drivers for some hardware. Many applications STILL
will ‘support’ being used in a 64 bit Windows and hardware
environment, but they do so in that emulation or
compatibility mode. Other applications will not work in a 64
bit environment at all. There are still only a handful of
applications are actually designed on 64 bit architecture
for Windows based systems.
So where are the applications?
Well, that is my question too. I have searched the internet
looking for application. There are two web sites that do a
pretty good job of listing the true 64-bit applications. The
first of the web sites is Start64 (http://www.start64.com/index.php) is a very good reference site for applications, drivers
and all things 64-bit and has a search function. There are
also ‘recommendations’ about what applications to use,
problems with drivers, etc. The second web site is 64x
Software
(http://www.64xsoft.com) which touts itself as ‘the
Catalogue of 64-bit Software’ and they do a good job too.
They have a section on their main page that, by category,
lists the number of applications that are available in a
particular category. As of the date of this writing (March
2008) the categories show just how sparse the applications
are for the categories! I included a screen shot of that
chart, shown below:

So where does that leave us? Well, just as with upgrades,
you should always check with your local hardware and
software provider to make sure your hardware, operating
system and applications will be compatible. Nothing is worse
than having to explain that the big purchase you just made
of new hardware, new operating system and new or upgraded
applications will not work with each other!
How can I get more information on this subject?
You can get more information about this subject? Well if you
have support with us, ask us. Often times we will have
additional suggestions about new solutions or emerging best
practices. If you have questions or comments about this
article, contact me (JohnBoline@hagerman.com).
All product names / logos, company names /
logos are copyrights of their respective holders. John Boline is an MCSE,
CNE, USE and a member of the Network Professional Association. The content
herein is often based on late-breaking events. Much of the material is based
on information from sources that are believed to be reliable. Hagerman &
Company, Inc. disclaims all warranties as to the ultimate accuracy or
completeness of the information. Hagerman & Company, Inc. and its employees
shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the
information contained within this article or for any interpretations
thereof. The recommendations, positions and best practice policies outlined
herein represent Hagerman & Company, Inc. initial analysis and therefore are
subject to change as further information which may have bearing on these
positions is made available. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the
selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions
expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Entire contents ©
2008 Hagerman & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this
publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden.
top
|
This page last edited on
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
|
|

by John Boline
Service Manager,
MCSE, CNE, USE
|