Contact Us Now 

Events  |  News  |  Press  |  Support  |  Training  |  Promotions  |  Locations  |  Careers  |  User Groups

  >   Shortcuts

 

Table of Contents

 

News Bulletin - AEC Edition

News Bulletin - MCAD Edition

New Bulletin - Archives

Customer Profiles

Industry News & Comment

Product Reviews

Cadtales

CRM News

Data Management & Consulting

Technical Perspective

Tips & Tricks

News & Events

Promotions
 

  Archives:
 

Technical Perspective Archives

 

   
 


 
 

 Technology Bulletin

Truth in Operating Systems:
Telling it like it is will make some people mad!

It seems that as time goes on, those who support a particular vendor’s operating system have allowed the chasm to grow deeper, not between the choices at hand but between their position and fact. In order to put things into perspective, you really need to step back. Academia tells students one thing, the press is quick to jump on the bandwagon, and everyone including the European Union seems to think that the product from Redmond (to use a line from Adam Sandler’s “The Waterboy’) is “the Devil.” Everyone likes to complain, but yet, the marketplace has done little to change the complexion of the computing landscape.

Apple Entertainment
No, I am not talking about an I-Pod or I-Tunes, I am talking about entertainment! Everyone has seen the Mac and PC advertisements. They are funny. They are entertaining. Yet, they are much like the political advertisements we are about to be bombarded with again: They point out the flaws, shortcomings or “features”’ on Microsoft’s products, while inferring the problems that Microsoft has, with endless patches, just goes on and on. Microsoft has played this card in the past too, in an ad where someone picks up a chair on the roadside with an Apple sitting in it, only to discover a smell in the car which results in the Apple being placed back on the curb. Yes, these ads are funny, but they do not leave you with a sense that one product is superior to another with any concrete evidence or fact. They really do little to promote what is good about a product, but rather point out the shortcomings of another product.

 

What about Linux?
Yes, Linux is out there, and some people use it. With all of its flavors, it has a relatively small portion of the market share. Why? For the same reason Apple has a smaller market share than Microsoft: applications. The most widely used applications today run on some flavor of Microsoft Windows. I am not touting the product, just stating a fact, one I can back up with data. Everyone says there are too many flavors of Windows, yet, with its open source and a plethora of companies selling it, Linux has more versions and subversions than Windows.
 

What about Market Share?
There are those that argue that market share cannot be used to determine the quality of the product. Those folks can argue all they want, but the fact is there are more personal computers running Windows today than all other operating systems combined. Yet critics content Windows is not reliable? Well, according to the Yankee Group, only Unix-based operating systems beat Windows on uptime. Windows 2003 Server led Red Hat Enterprise Linux with nearly 20 percent more annual uptime. One percent of enterprise customers run Linux desktops, according to the Gartner Group. That number is expected to reach 3.2 percent by the end of 2008. According to Market Share by Net Applications, this is the breakdown of market penetration in March 2007 by operating system:

 

 

Patches, we don’t need no stinking patches!
(With apologies to Mel Brooks)
Okay, we all saw the headlines about Microsoft’s Patch Release on May, 8, 2007. On that day, Microsoft issued software updates to plug at least 19 separate security holes in its Windows operating system and other software, including two vulnerabilities that criminals are actively exploiting to take control of Windows PCs. Mac had one too. On April 23 of this year, Apple reported fixes for 25 Mac OS X flaws. Yes, Linux has patches too, as does the Firefox browser, Opera, etc. The bottom line is no product is perfect; if it were, we would all be using it. To a big extent all the contention between Microsoft and Mac users is like the spouting of those who like Ford trucks over Chevy trucks. Each swears they have the best and the other one is junk!

Everyone Lies!
Everyone lies; a line used repeatedly by Hugh Laurie on Fox’s “House.” While in the computing world, the lies may be masked untruths or simple lies of omission, the thing is that if you have more product installed, running a larger application base than anyone else in the world, you will be a bigger target for programmers who want to find and exploit weaknesses and you will have a larger number, overall, of patches than anyone else. Simple math would indicate the probability of this to be the case when you have more than 90 percent of the world’s installed base. Does that mean Microsoft should be complacent? No! Does it mean that innovation is done? No again. Remember, in 1899, then Patent Commissioner, Charles H. Duell reportedly announced that "everything that can be invented has been invented." Obviously, he was wrong. If someone can invent a better operating system, it will happen, and those of you who think that Microsoft or anyone else can squash that creativity with all of the scrutiny they are under, well, I doubt it. If you have questions or comments about this article, contact me (JohnBoline@hagerman.com).

 

All product names / logos, company names / logos are copyrights of their respective holders. John Boline is an MCSE, CNE, USE and a member of the Network Professional Association. The content herein is often based on late-breaking events. Much of the material is based on information from sources that are believed to be reliable. Hagerman & Company, Inc. disclaims all warranties as to the ultimate accuracy or completeness of the information. Hagerman & Company, Inc. and its employees shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained within this article or for any interpretations thereof. The recommendations, positions and best practice policies outlined herein represent Hagerman & Company, Inc. initial analysis and therefore are subject to change as further information which may have bearing on these positions is made available. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Entire contents © 2007 Hagerman & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden.

 

top

 

 

This page last edited on Wednesday, September 17, 2008


 

e-vol. 55, May 2007

by John Boline
Service Manager,
MCSE, CNE, USE


 


print version

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Anaheim, CA  |  Chicago, IL  Cincinnati, OH  Evansville, IN  Glendale, CA  |  Indianapolis, IN  |  Knoxville, TN  |  Louisville, KY |  Memphis, TN  |  Mishawaka, IN  |   Mt. Zion, IL   Nashville, TN  | 
Sacramento, CA 
|  San Diego, CA  |  San Jose, CA  |  San Ramon, CA |  Schaumburg, IL  St. Louis, MO   

Copyright © 2008
Hagerman & Company, Inc.